Academic Supervisor
Critique · Structure · Supervision
A supervisor that challenges your thinking — and never writes a word of it.
Real critique in minutes, an argument against your choices, and a revision history that proves the work is yours — for students, supervisors and institutions.
Get started → See a real critique Institutions: talk to us about a rolloutFor Students
A supervisor with time. Critique, sparring, and a way to get unstuck without being written for.
For Supervisors
The fifth reading, done before it reaches you. Read and comment — never edit.
For Institutions
Your own structures and rubrics, board sign-off, bulk enrolment and allocation.
AI guidance. Your academic judgement.
Three rules it will not break — the reason it holds up in a viva when a writing tool does not.
Question, don't just answer.
Every weakness comes back as a question you answer — not a paragraph you paste.
Understand, don't outsource.
It argues against your choices so you have to defend them. What survives is yours to say aloud.
Research remains yours.
No autocomplete, no rewrite, no insert button. Every draft is kept, so the record shows the work grew in your hands.
What a critique looks like.
Six problem statements from six continents. Every weakness arrives as a question you have to answer. There is nothing here to copy.
Strength
Weakness
↳ Which studies did you search, and what exactly do they cover that leaves this gap open?
Weakness
↳ Is your rationale for excluding measurement epistemological or practical?
Omission
↳ Who misjudges what, because this understanding is missing?
From researchers using it.
Attributed and named — nothing here is invented.
“[A student, in their own words, on the first critique they received.]”
“[A supervisor on what reached their desk after the platform had read it first.]”
“[A head of department on board sign-off, or the revision history as evidence.]”
“[A doctoral candidate on defending a choice the platform had argued against.]”
“[A graduate-school dean on rolling it out across a faculty.]”
Start with one section.
Write your problem statement, ask for a critique, and see whether the questions are ones you can answer. New accounts start with credits to try it.